Articles Tagged with South Carolina workers’ compensation attorney

A worker was killed in a Rock Hill construction accident at a high school campus recently. boom lift

The decedent was later identified as a 20-year-old from North Carolina. He had been operating a boom lift at the time of the incident, since he was working on ongoing brick-cladding repair to the exterior of the high school.

Authorities revealed he worked for a construction subcontractor, and the Occupational Safety & Health Administration has launched its own investigation into the incident. The construction company released a statement expressing condolences and also insisting this was an “isolated incident.”

Continue reading

The South Carolina Supreme Court issued a workers’ compensation case ruling that it conceded was as “rare as the proverbial hens’ teeth.” It had to do with an immediate appeal of an interlocutory administrative decision. Normally, in these cases, such matters must reach a final conclusion before either side can appeal them. However in this case, which justices described as a set of “extraordinary circumstances,” the court ruled that requiring the plaintiff to wait for a final agency decision wouldn’t provide him with an adequate remedy. spiderTo explain why, we start by explaining there was never a dispute in Hilton v. Flakeboard America Limited as to the compensability of the plaintiff’s work-related injury. Both sides agreed the plaintiff sustained a compensable injury as a result of an insect or spider bite while working at a sustainable forest product manufacturer. The issue was whether the plaintiff required additional medical treatment to reach maximum medical improvement.

Maximum medical improvement is one of the thorniest issues in workers’ compensation claims. It’s the point at which the worker’s injuries have stabilized, and any further functional improvement is not likely, even with continued physical therapy or medical treatment. In other words, that’s as good as it’s going to get. From this point, the employer is going to seek a determination of the degree of permanent or partial impairment, which will set the stage for all future workers’ compensation benefits. It will define which long-term benefits the employee can expect.

Continue reading

In workers’ compensation cases, part of what employees gave up in the “grand bargain” for no-fault benefits for workplace injuries and illnesses was the right to sue their employer for negligence. That means even if a worker would likely have received more compensation as a result of a personal injury negligence lawsuit, the employee can’t sue the company so long as the injury is covered under workers’ compensation laws. gavel7

Co-workers also are protected under this provision, and workers can’t sue them, even if their negligence caused or contributed to the accident.

But sometimes the question of who is “co-worker” – particularly on a construction site – can get tricky. That’s because there may be a number of different contractor and subcontractors, and some may under state law be extended protection under the exclusive remedy provision. It’s important to differentiate because when one can take action against a third party, recovery in addition to workers’ compensation may be obtained.

This was the issue in the recent case of TIC Energy & Chem, Inc. v. Martin, recently before the Texas Supreme Court. Of course, it’s important to point out that case law varies from state-to-state, but this case outlines situations we see crop up in North Carolina cases too.  Continue reading

The South Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of a Greenville workers’ compensation plaintiff who was injured on the job while pregnant.store1

In Russell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., plaintiff was an assistant store manager who had worked at the site for more than a decade. In the fall of 2009, she was lifting something at work when she suffered injury to her pelvis and back. Because of her pregnancy, there was no diagnostic testing done and her treatment was very conservative. After she gave birth, she underwent an MRI scan and was treated with medication, exercises and injection. Her doctor at the time did not feel surgery was necessary.

She continued to work at the store, with a restriction indicated she could not do heavy lifting (more than 30 pounds). Around this time, she was diagnosed with back strain and degenerative disc disease. By 2011, she was ruled to have reached maximum medical improvement and was granted 7 percent permanent partial disability. The reward also gave her compensation for ongoing anti-inflammatory medications as necessary for treatment of her work-related injuries. Continue reading

Contact Information